CASE DIGEST: NAGUIAT vs. NLRC. G.R. No. 116123. March 13, 1997
FACTS:
Petitioner CFTI
held a concessionaire's contract with the Army Air Force Exchange Services
("AAFES") for the operation of taxi services within Clark Air
Base. Sergio Naguiat was CFTI's president, while Antolin Naguiat was
its vice-president.
Like Naguiat Enterprises, a trading firm, it was a family-owned
corporation. Individual respondents were previously employed by CFTI as taxicab
drivers.
Due to the
phase-out of the US military bases in the Philippines, from which Clark Air
Base was not spared, the AAFES was dissolved, and the services of individual
respondents were officially terminated. Respondents and CFTI held negotiations
as regards separation benefits that should be awarded in favor of the drivers. However,
individual respondents herein refused to accept theirs. Instead, they filed a
complaint against "Sergio F. Naguiat, and CFTI with Antolin T.
Naguiat as vice president and general manager doing business under the name and
style of Naguiat Enterprises for payment of separation pay due to
termination/phase-out.
ISSUE:
Whether
the President of the Corporation may be held liable solidarily with the payment
of corporation’s obligations.
RULING:
YES. Sergio F. Naguiat, admittedly, was
the president of CFTI who actively managed the business. Thus, applying
the ruling in A. C. Ransom, he falls within the meaning of an
"employer" as contemplated by the Labor Code, who may be held jointly
and severally liable for the obligations of the corporation to its dismissed
employees.
Moreover,
petitioners also conceded that both CFTI and Naguiat Enterprises were
"close family corporations" owned by the Naguiat family.
Section
100, paragraph 5, (under Title XII on Close Corporations) of the Corporation
Code, states:
"(5) To
the extent that the stockholders are actively engage(d) in the management or
operation of the business and affairs of a close corporation, the stockholders
shall be held to strict fiduciary duties to each other and among
themselves. Said stockholders shall be personally liable for
corporate torts unless the corporation has obtained reasonably adequate
liability insurance."
Comments
Post a Comment